Evidence Hub

Molecular characterization and mutational analysis of antibiotic resistance genes isolated in enterococcus faecalis from urinary tract infection patients in peshawar

Zahidullah Khan, Adnan Mumtaz, Sadaf Bilal, Maham Iqbal, Waseem Abbas, M. Khalid

Northwest journal of medical sciences, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is a leading causative agent of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and poses a significant public health concern due to its multidrug resistance. Understanding its resistance mechanisms is essential for improving treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and molecular characteristics of antibiotic resistance genes in E. faecalis isolates from UTI patients in Peshawar.

METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 137 urine samples, collected from inpatients and outpatients diagnosed with UTIs at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Bacterial identification was performed using selective culture media, Gram staining, and biochemical tests. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method following CLSI 2022 guidelines. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was employed to detect resistance genes (CTXM, AmpC, Tet A, Tet B), followed by Sanger sequencing for mutational analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS: Enterococcus faecalis showed high resistance to erythromycin (92%), ciprofloxacin (92%), tetracycline (84%), and penicillin (94%) but remained susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. Molecular analysis detected CTXM (73%), AmpC (78%), Tet A (71%), and Tet B (58%). Mutational analysis revealed non-synonymous mutations in CTXM and AmpC…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free