Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of community-acquired urinary tract infection in adults: A seven months prospective cross-sectional study in Dakar Town, Senegal

M. Barry, B. A. Diallo, D. Kanté, I. Diallo

2017

494 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction With the increasing trend of antibiotic resistance, the management of urinary tract infection (UTI) is likely to become complicated, and there is a need for continuous surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility of uropathogens. Objective This study aimed to assess the current antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in the common uropathogens isolated from outpatients and hospitalized ( Subjects and methods This was a prospective observational study examining urinary isolates from patients aged ≥18 years. Urine samples were collected from 494 consecutive outpatient adults, clinically-suspected cases of urinary tract infections. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were carried out using the VITEK ® 2 Compact kit of bioMerieux. Results The observed prevalence of UTI was (132/494) 26.7%, 95% CI [22.9%; 30.9%]. Among the 147 organisms isolated from 132 patients, more than 90% (133) were Gram-negative bacteria. Imipenem appeared as the most active drug, with less than 3% resistance of isolates. Amikacin and cefotaxim were in general active with susceptibility rate of 70% and 67% of isolates, respectively. However cefixim was the most active oral drug tested (61%). Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid and fluoroquinolons were the less active drug displaying a resistance rate of 73%, 69% and 60% respectively. Conclusion Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid and fluoroquinolons should no longer be used as empirical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 494 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free