Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns in Outpatient Urinary Tract Infection in the District of Coimbra, Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study

C. Curto, I. Rosendo, Luiz Miguel Santiago

Acta Médica Portuguesa, 2019

5 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infections in the community setting are quite common. It is necessary to be aware of antibiotic susceptibility patterns in order to provide rational empirical therapy. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of the strains responsible for urinary tract infections in primary health care, in the district of Coimbra, Portugal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this observational and cross-sectional study, we analyzed 7134 positive urine cultures of outpatient laboratories in the district of Coimbra, over one year. In most cases, a positive culture was defined by a threshold of 105 colony-forming units per milliliter and was conducted by the automated system VITEK® 2, by bioMérieux. We used descriptive and inferential statistics to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria and to ascertain whether there were differences associated with sex and age.

RESULTS

From the total of positive cultures, 83.4% pertained to females and 41.0% to individuals over 75 years old. Escherichia coli was the most frequent strain (63.9%), although its prevalence was lower (p < 0.001) in males and individuals over 75 years old. Its susceptibility to fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin was higher than 95% and with ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole it was lower than 80%. Resistances were more frequent (p < 0.001) in males and in the elderly.

DISCUSSION

Escherichia coli was the most frequent strain, revealing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free