Evidence Hub

High Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance in the Uropathogenic Bacteria Associated with Different Urological Diseases and Metabolic Complications: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study

Yuvarajan Subramaniyan, Altaf Khan, M. Mujeeburahiman, P. Rekha

Microbial Drug Resistance, 2024

258 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Urological diseases affect all age groups and are associated with different urinary complications. Presence of pathogenic bacteria complicates the urological diseases such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), kidney stone disease (KSD), emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN), and urological cancers (UCs) coinciding with urinary metabolic complications. The One Health concept for preventing the spread of antibiotic resistant opportunistic pathogens necessitates detailed investigation on the virulence and the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of the pathogens from the urinary tract infections (UTIs). This cross-sectional study was aimed to profile the pathogenic bacteria associated with different urological diseases that included urine samples from the patients from a tertiary care hospital. The study included 258 patients representing CKD (15.1%), KSD (28.7%), EPN (15.5%), UC (12.0%), and UTI patients without any urological diseases (28.7%) with overall 70.5% patients showing positive urine culture. Furthermore, other than UTI in patients without any urological diseases (100%), higher culture positive cases were seen in KSD (64.9%), followed by CKD (61.5%), EPN (52.5%), and UC (48.4%). Escherichia coli was the most predominant bacteria in UTI (35.1%) and EPN (66.7%). In KSD, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (41.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.8%), and Proteus mirabilis (14.6%) were more common. S. aureus (86.7%) was the most isolated bacteria from the UC cases. Overall rate of multidrug…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 258 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free