Evidence Hub

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Trends of ESBL-Producing Escherichia Coli in UTIs in Patna Medical College & Hospital, Patna

K. Kumari, Sushma Kumari, Pratulya Nandan, Vijay Kumar

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, 2026

326 participants

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common worldwide, with Escherichia coli as the predominant

pathogen. The emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli poses a significant

therapeutic challenge due to multidrug resistance.

Aim: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns of ESBL-producing E. coli

in patients with UTIs.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Microbiology, Patna Medical College

and Hospital, Patna, India. Midstream urine samples from 326 patients with culture-confirmed UTIs were

analyzed. E. coli isolates were identified using standard biochemical tests, and ESBL production was confirmed

via the Combined Disk Test. Antibiotic susceptibility was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method

following CLSI guidelines.

Results: All 326 isolates were E. coli, with 121 (37.12%) confirmed as ESBL producers. ESBL-positive isolates

showed high resistance to cefotaxime (100%), ceftriaxone (98.3%), ceftazidime (97.5%), amoxicillin (96.7%),

and ciprofloxacin (84.3%). Carbapenems (meropenem, 94.2% sensitivity), nitrofurantoin (81%), and amikacin

(66.1%) remained effective. ESBL prevalence was not significantly associated with age or sex but correlated

strongly with cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone resistance.

Conclusion: ESBL-producing E. coli constitutes a significant proportion of UTI pathogens with extensive

multidrug resistance. Carbapenems, nitrofurantoin,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 326 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free