Evidence Hub

Morganella Morganii Respiratory Infection as an Initial Presentation of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Monocytic Differentiation: A Rare Opportunistic Pathogen in a Newly Diagnosed Immunocompromised Host

Muppidi V, Manoharan R, Isshak R, Zoey AS, Mercado I, Michael P

Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports, 2026

Abstract

Infective manifestations of hematological malignancies can be traced to a variety of pathogens, necessitating broad spectrum empiric antibiotic coverage, and prompt identification of pathogenic microbes to improve clinical outcomes. We present a case of Morganella morganii leading to pneumonia as the presenting illness in a previously undiagnosed, functionally neutropenic adult presenting with acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation. Our patient was a 64 year old man with no prior medical care who presented with complaints of progressive abdominal pain, productive cough and fevers. Chest radiography revealed no organized consolidations, and computed tomographic imaging of the chest showed bibasilar atelectasis and trace pleural effusions. Laboratory analysis revealed marked leukocytosis with predominant monocytosis, and circulating blasts, suggestive of acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation, later confirmed with bone marrow biopsy. The patient was initially started on guideline directed empiric therapy for respiratory infection, with sputum cultures later found to be growing Morganella morganii, necessitating a change in antimicrobial therapy, following which the patient showed clinical improvement. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of Morganella morganii pneumonia presenting at the initial diagnostic encounter of de novo acute myelomonocytic leukemia. This report underscores the need for prompt microbiologic evaluation, broad…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free