Evidence Hub

A Potentially Misleading Name: Staphylococcus argenteus in an Urosepsis: A Case Report

Maillart E, Yin N, Dumitru M, Hasnaoui Y, Talpos MT, Mahadeb B, Clevenbergh P

Case reports in infectious diseases, 2025

Abstract

Staphylococcus argenteus, a recently recognized species within the Staphylococcus aureus complex, shares numerous virulence traits with S. aureus. While S. argenteus typically lacks pigmentation and exhibits greater antibiotic susceptibility compared to S. aureus, it can cause severe infections, including bacteremia. Clinicians can be misled by its name and may not give it the necessary attention. It may also be misidentified as a S. aureus by the microbiology lab. We present the case of a 56-year-old man with a complex medical history who developed a polymicrobial urosepsis involving S. argenteus. It was initially misinterpreted as a contaminant in urinary samples by an external laboratory. The patient subsequently developed septic shock and was admitted to intensive care unit. The blood cultures confirmed S. argenteus associated with E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteremia. He was successfully treated with high-dose intravenous floxacillin and oral ciprofloxacin. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed the isolate as S. argenteus (ST2250). This case underscores the diagnostic and clinical challenges posed by S. argenteus, particularly in regions where its prevalence is low. S. argenteus harbors the majority of S. aureus virulence genes and causes a comparable spectrum of disease. Epidemiological data indicate regional differences in its prevalence and clinical impact. Some studies report lower virulence while others suggest worse outcomes. The case illustrates the importance of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free