Evidence Hub

First Report from Colombia of a Urinary Tract Infection Caused by Kluyvera ascorbata Exhibiting an AmpC Resistance Pattern: A Case Report

Artunduaga-Cañas E, Vidal-Cañas S, Pérez-Garay V, Valencia-Ibarguen J, Lopez-Muñoz DF, Liscano Y

Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections represent a significant healthcare burden, particularly among vulnerable patients with chronic comorbidities. In this case report, we describe a UTI caused by Kluyvera ascorbata exhibiting an AmpC resistance pattern in an 85-year-old male with stage IV chronic kidney disease and a history of ESBL-positive infection. Methods: A comprehensive diagnostic workup was performed, including clinical evaluation, laboratory tests (urinalysis, complete blood count, renal function tests), and microbiological cultures with antibiogram analysis using the MicroScan WalkAway (Beckman Coulter, Brea, United States) and VITEK2 Compact systems (bioMérieux, Marcy L'Étoile or Craponne, France). Results: The initial urine culture revealed a Gram-negative bacillus and subsequent identification confirmed K. ascorbata, which demonstrated resistance to ampicillin and cefazolin while remaining susceptible to meropenem. The patient received intravenous meropenem therapy for 10 days, resulting in clinical improvement and a subsequent negative urine culture. Conclusions: This case reports a complicated urinary tract infection caused by K. ascorbata with an AmpC resistance pattern, highlighting the importance of considering this infrequently reported pathogen and its resistance profile in vulnerable patients. Its multidrug-resistant profile underscores the necessity for vigilant antimicrobial stewardship and further research to develop standardized treatment protocols…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free