Evidence Hub

Bacterial Infection in Ebola Virus Disease, Marburg Virus Disease, Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, and Lassa Fever

Page B, Moreton E, Wohl DA, Fischer WA

Open forum infectious diseases, 2026

46 participants

Abstract

Background: Concern for bacterial coinfection in patients with high consequence viral infections (HCVIs) has made empiric antibiotic administration the standard of care. However, the incidence, microbiology, and clinical significance of bacterial coinfection in HCVIs remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of case reports, cohort studies, and cross-sectional analyses describing bacterial coinfection in Ebola virus disease (EVD), Marburg virus disease (MVD), Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), and Lassa fever (LF). Data were extracted on study design, setting, diagnostic methods, pathogens, antibiotic use, and outcomes.

Results: Thirty publications met inclusion criteria. Bacteremia was most commonly reported among patients with CCHF (n = 46), followed by EVD (n = 16), MVD (n = 16), and LF (n = 2). Of 27 EVD patients treated outside Africa, 7 (26%) had bacterial coinfection. Across HCVIs, bacteremia was detected a median of 11 days after symptom onset (range 0-23) and was associated with features of sepsis. Pathogens included enteric flora, healthcare-associated organisms, opportunistic pathogens, and zoonotic bacteria-most notably Brucella spp. in CCHF. Ceftriaxone was the most common empiric antibiotic but is predicted to have activity against a minority of bloodstream isolates. Mortality among coinfected patients with EVD or MVD was similar to those without bacterial coinfection, whereas coinfected CCHF patients had higher mortality than those without…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free