Evidence Hub

Next-generation bacteriophage therapeutic systems: CRISPR-based engineering, near-infrared bioimaging, and precision strategies for treating multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant bacterial infections

Piracha ZZ, Saeed U

Frontiers in microbiology, 2026

5 citations

Abstract

The rapid rise of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant bacterial infections has renewed interest in bacteriophages as adaptable, targeted antimicrobials. Recent advances in phage engineering, including CRISPR-based approaches, now make it possible to refine host range, strengthen lytic performance, and deliver genetic payloads that target clinically important resistance determinants such as blaNDM, mecA, and mcr-1. In parallel, jumbo phages with large genomes often encode additional functions that support replication and biofilm disruption, offering practical advantages in densely structured infections where antibiotics perform poorly. A second limitation in phage translation has been measurement: in most settings, dosing and treatment duration remain guided by indirect endpoints rather than real-time information on distribution and activity. Near-infrared bioimaging addresses this gap by enabling noninvasive tracking of infection burden and phage kinetics in vivo through bacteriophytochrome-derived reporters, including iRFPs, miRFPs, and PAiRFPs. In this review, we bring these developments together and discuss how CRISPR-enabled phage engineering, jumbo-phage biology, and near-infrared readouts can be integrated into a precision framework that is measurable, adaptable, and clinically interpretable. We examine evidence across major drug-resistant pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free