Evidence Hub

Community-Acquired Escherichia coli Meningoencephalitis and Brain Abscess in an Immunocompromised Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

Kalakos N, Kalfoutzou A, Katsarou A, Zormpala T, Papakonstantinou MK, Ntaskagianni E, Kouveletsou M, Sfikas S et al.

Cureus, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Gram-negative bacterial meningitis (GNBM) is rare, primarily affecting infants. Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most common cause, with high mortality and poor clinical outcomes. We report a rare case of an immunocompromised 61-year-old male with a history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia who presented with altered mental status and fever. He was diagnosed with E. coli meningoencephalitis complicated by brain abscess, likely secondary to otitis media. Despite initial medical management, neurosurgical intervention was required due to abscess progression. The patient fully recovered following craniotomy, targeted antimicrobial therapy, and intravenous immunoglobulin administration. A comprehensive literature review was performed, including 142 cases of spontaneous community-acquired E. coli meningitis in adults from January 2000 to January 2024. The most common risk factors identified were urinary tract infection (24.4%), immunosuppression (22.1%), and diabetes mellitus (19.1%). Clinical manifestations frequently included fever (65.3%), altered mental status (50%), and neck stiffness (41.9%). Pneumocephalus was the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, with a 93% decrease in the odds of survival (odds ratio: 0.071; 95% CI: 0.005-0.942; p=0.045). Survivors had significantly lower CRP and higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose levels compared to non-survivors. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of community-acquired E. coli…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free