Evidence Hub

Rare Urinary Tract Infection by Rodentibacter pneumotropicus (formerly, Pasteurella pneumotropica) in an Immunocompetent Patient

Elena Soto-Vega, Elizabeth Bello-Rossette, María del Carmen Cabrera-Martínez, J. C. Arroyo Kuribreña

The American journal of case reports, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Patient: Male, 37-year-old Final Diagnosis: Urinary tract infection Symptoms: Diarrhea • fever • hematuria • leukocytosis • lower urinary tract symptoms • nausea • right lumbar pain • weight loss Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Microbiology and Virology • Urology Objective: Rare disease Background Pasteurella pneumotropica has been reclassified as Rodentibacter pneumotropicus after advancements in genetic and phenotypic analyses revealed genetic diversity and phylogenetic distinctions within the pneumotropica complex. This reorganization resolved issues of misclassification and provided a clearer framework for understanding the epidemiology and clinical relevance of these organisms. R. pneumotropicus is a gram-negative bacillus commonly found in the respiratory tracts of mammals, particularly rodents. However, it rarely infects humans. This case is notable for presenting a urinary tract infection caused by R. pneumotropicus in an immunocompetent patient, a rare manifestation highlighting the need to consider less-common pathogens in daily clinical practice to choose the correct treatments. Case Report This case describes a 37-year-old immunocompetent man who initially presented to a hospital in Mexico with gastrointestinal symptoms and later developed urinary issues following a ureteroscopy for a proximal ureteral stone. Despite initial treatment with meropenem and paracetamol, the patient had persistent fever and leukocytosis. According to the available material at the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free