Evidence Hub

Poor Effect of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteria on Myroides spp.: A Case Report and Literature Review

Juusola T, Rahkonen M, Aho-Laukkanen E, Mäki-Koivisto V, Junttila IS

Case reports in infectious diseases, 2025

Abstract

Background: Myroides spp. are a group of Gram-negative bacteria which may cause opportunistic infections in humans. They are widely resistant to clinically relevant empiric antibiotics. Importantly, the focus of infection, regional susceptibility data, and patient's medical history dictate the choice of an empiric antibiotic treatment. Unfortunately, the empiric treatment is not always optimal. Especially immunocompromised patients are at risk of having opportunistic infections, which are not necessarily common causes of typical infections.

Case presentation: We report here a case of a patient with several comorbidities, including chronic kidney failure, heart failure, and leg ulcers, who developed fever and infection of his chronic leg ulcers. Cefuroxime was initiated as an empiric treatment of suspected sepsis with unknown origin. Two days later, the initial blood culture sample indicated Gram-negative rods which VITEK MS mass spectrometry identified as Myroides spp. The patient's antibiotics were first changed to meropenem, and the next day, ciprofloxacin was added. After susceptibility testing, ciprofloxacin was changed to levofloxacin. Fortunately, the patient recovered with the treatment and was discharged from hospital.

Conclusions: Myroides spp. are widely resistant opportunistic pathogens to acknowledge to be out of reach for first-line empiric antibiotic treatment. Myroides cases reported earlier have suggested soil exposure or pig bite as potential sources of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free