Evidence Hub

Genomic tracing and resolution of environmental Klebsiella pneumoniae ST307 CTX-M-15 linked to a nosocomial urinary tract infection in a cat: a veterinary teaching hospital case study

Mezzasalma N, Spadini C, Rega M, Montanaro SL, Iannarelli M, Cataldo E, Fidanzio F, Corsini A et al.

BMC veterinary research, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are a significant concern in human medicine and have increasingly been reported in veterinary settings as well. Veterinary Teaching Hospitals may present a heightened risk for HAIs, partly due to the lack of standardized infection control measures and screening protocols. In May 2022, a cat previously hospitalized at a Veterinary Teaching Hospital for urinary tract obstruction developed a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). A multidrug-resistant (MDR) strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae was isolated. To investigate the suspected HAI and assess the presence of other MDR Gram-negative bacteria, an environmental screening of different hospital surfaces was conducted using both phenotypic and genotypic analyses. RESULTS: A total of 70 swabs were collected from environmental surfaces, 51 before and 19 after cleaning procedures. Sterility was observed in 19.6% (10/51) of samples collected before cleaning and in 26.3% (5/19) of those collected afterward. Four Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were isolated: two from the environment (a keyboard in the ultrasound room and a cattery cage) and two from the patient (urine and a bladder clot). All four isolates were identified as a single clone of K. pneumoniae sequence type ST307, carrying the CTX-M-15 gene, the GyrA-83I and ParC-80I point mutations, and the oqxA and oqxB resistance genes, which confer resistance to disinfectants. Environmental screening also yielded 13…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free