Evidence Hub

Multiple Deep Abscesses Caused by Disseminated Nocardia farcinica Infection After Immunosuppressive Treatment for Membranous Nephropathy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Zhang C, Zhu J, Luo J, Hu X, Liu H, Liu J, Shi M

Infection and drug resistance, 2026

Abstract

Nocardia farcinica is a highly virulent opportunistic pathogen with a marked propensity to cause disseminated infection in immunocompromised hosts. Its clinical manifestations are often nonspecific, conventional empirical anti-infective therapy may be ineffective, and both misdiagnosis and mortality rates remain high. We report the case of a 20-year-old man with membranous nephropathy who developed multiple cutaneous and deep soft-tissue abscesses, fever, and pulmonary infiltrates after 7 months of dual immunosuppressive therapy with methylprednisolone and tacrolimus. Initial empirical treatment with oxacillin plus moxifloxacin failed to control the infection, and the patient continued to experience high fever with persistently elevated inflammatory markers. Direct smear examination of pus specimens showed weakly acid-fast, branching filamentous organisms, and culture followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identified the pathogen as Nocardia farcinica. According to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, therapy was adjusted to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SMZ-TMP) combined with amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium. The patient subsequently became afebrile, the abscesses gradually decreased in size, and inflammatory markers improved substantially. After clinical stabilization, he was discharged on continued oral anti-infective therapy and showed no evidence of recurrence during 12 months of outpatient follow-up.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free