Evidence Hub

Plasma metagenomic cfDNA sequencing identifies pathogens in culture-negative sepsis following urinary pouch rupture

Hoeter K, Marriott L, Neuberger EWI, Dagwadordsch U, Kumar RS, Simon P, Bodenstein M, Kersaudy-Kerhoas M

BMJ case reports, 2026

Abstract

A patient with a complex urological history presented with abdominal pain and respiratory distress after catheter dysfunction. She underwent emergency surgery for a ruptured urinary pouch. Sepsis was later diagnosed based on clinical deterioration, including tachycardia, fever, an elevated respiratory rate and raised inflammatory markers, but blood cultures remained negative. A metagenomic microbial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assay (iSEP-SEQ), performed early from plasma as part of a research protocol, identified Klebsiella and Pseudomonas at the genus level. Results were obtained retrospectively and were not available in real time; therefore, they did not alter immediate management. These findings were confirmed by cultures from drainage fluid and urine. Broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment led to clinical improvement. This case highlights the limitations of conventional microbiological methods in culture-negative sepsis and illustrates the role of cfDNA-based metagenomic testing as an adjunctive and complementary diagnostic tool for early, accurate pathogen detection. Early use of such tools may support timely and targeted management in complex infectious disease presentations.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free