Evidence Hub

Use of standard definitions for the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacteria: a systematic review and framework for future consensus definitions

Tan WC, Daniel SRE, Tan YL, Andrew Wong YW, Singh SR, Paterson D, Mo Y

JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026

Abstract

Background: Various terms are used to categorize the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. It is important to standardize the classification of drug-resistant bacteria to ensure clarity and generalizability of evidence across different disciplines and inform policy.

Methods: A literature search for articles published between 2011 and August 2025 indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE, which used the terms: multidrug resistance, extensively drug resistance, pan-drug resistance, difficult-to-treat or usual drug resistance in either the methods or results sections, and which reported bacterial pathogens relevant to human health was performed. Data extracted were analysed quantitatively using multivariable logistic regressions and qualitatively to examine the study characteristics that adopted various definitions.

Results: From 2465 eligible records, the most commonly used definition was by Magiorakos et al. accounting for 54% (1340/2465) of the articles: 8% (197/2465) used different definitions, and the remaining 38% (928/2465) did not define drug resistance. Overall, MDR was the most frequently used term (97%, 2400/2465), followed by XDR then PDR. Gram-negative bacteria were the most commonly studied bacteria (84%, 2078/2465). Definitions that deviated from those proposed by Magiorakos et al. used a different number of antibiotic classes to define extent of resistance, included non-susceptibility to newer antibiotic classes, studied typically community-acquired bacteria and used…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free