Evidence Hub

Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Enterococci Isolated From Humans, Animals, and Environment in Bangladesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sakib MAN, Mitro P, Rana MS, Mazumder Z, Mamun TI, Roy M, Islam MK, Emon AA et al.

International journal of microbiology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Enterococci are important opportunistic pathogens responsible for a wide range of infections in humans and animals. Their ability to acquire and disseminate antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a growing public health concern. This study is aimed at estimating the pooled prevalence of enterococci and their AMR profiles among isolates from humans, animals, and environmental sources in Bangladesh.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and CAB Abstracts in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published between January 2016 and November 2025 that reported the prevalence and/or AMR patterns of enterococci in Bangladesh were eligible for inclusion. A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis, with heterogeneity assessed via Cochran's Q and the I 2 statistic; AMR proportions were estimated using the Wilson method, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots.

Results: The pooled prevalence of enterococci was estimated at 12.05% (95% CI: 7.10-19.70), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 99.4%). Among eight identified Enterococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis was the most prevalent (25.1%; 95% CI: 20.9-29.2), followed by Enterococcus faecium (6.3%; 95% CI: 4.6-7.9). High resistance rates were observed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free