Evidence Hub

Risk factors or predictors of developing ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and third generation cephalosporin resistance in escherichia coli infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

DESHWAL PR, Reddy NS, Raisa Fathima, M Aggarwal, P TIWARI

Current Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2023

9,891 participants

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that by 2050, ten million people a year could be dying as a result of Anti-Microbial Resistance (AMR). An increase in resistance has been observed for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole followed by ciprofloxacin and third-generation cephalosporins in the management of Escherichia coli infections. To identify risk factors for ciprofloxacin (Cip-REC), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX-REC,) and third-generation cephalosporin (TGC-REC) resistance in Escherichia coli infection relative to controls patients. A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases identified case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies on risk factors for Cip-REC, TMP/SMX-REC, and TGC-REC-infected patients. A random-effects model was used to pool odds ratios (ORs) of developing resistant E. coli infection. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022297043). A total of 23 studies were included (9891 participants). Overall, 22, 8, and 11 risk factors were identified for developing Cip-REC, TMP/SMX-REC, and TGC-REC infections respectively. The prior antibiotic use [OR=3.19] reported high pooled ORs for Cip-REC infection. TMP/SMX-REC infection was associated with genitourinary abnormalities [OR=2.91]. Further analysis unveiled potential factors for TGC-REC infection; prior history of admission [OR=3.14] and hemodialysis [OR=2.20]. Prior antibiotic usage, genitourinary disorders, and admission history increase the risk of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,891 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free