Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy of Carbapenems versus Other Best Available Antibiotics in the Management of Patients with Urinary Tract Infections

Ruoa Faisal Albunayyan, Bushra Alqurashi, Yasser Alharbi, Aisha Alshaer, Jomana Alsudais, Ahad Alghthami, Jumana Alsharif, Lujain Alabbas et al.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 2022

2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Carbapenems are found in high concentrations in urine and are mainly eliminated by the kidney. Hence, they are the preferred treatment for pyelonephritis and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria. The recent emergence of bacterial resistance to carbapenems has resulted in the need to search for alternative treatments for complicated UTIs. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of Carbapenems versus Piperacillin/tacobactam (or the best available antibiotic therapy) in the management of pyelonephritis in patients with upper UTIs. Methods: A systematic review was carried out to compile all relevant studies on the use of Carbapenems versus Piperacillin/tacobactam in the treatment of upper urinary tract infections, namely pyelonephritis. A meta-analysis was carried out of the selected studies, including clinical trials composed of adult patients aged between 18 and 80 years old diagnosed with pyelonephritis. Primary screening of eligible studies was followed by the removal of duplicates and exclusion of non-eligible and unavailable full-text trials. Results: This review included four studies on the treatment of complicated pyelonephritis. The number of patients included per study varied and ranged from 62 to 421 cases. Different types and regimes of carbapenems were used, including intravenous Meropenem-Vaborbactam, Meropenem, Biapenem, Doripenem, or Ertapenem. The included studies compared…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free