Evidence Hub

Therapeutic effect of the quinolone prodrug prulifloxacin against experimental urinary tract infections in mice

Tomii Y, Ozaki M, Matsuda M, Honmura T, Nishimura I, Yamaguchi R, Adachi T, Okawa Y et al.

Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1996

6 citations

Abstract

The in vitro antibacterial activity of prulifloxacin (CAS 123447-62-1, NM441), a new quinoline prodrug, against clinical isolates from urinary tract infections was investigated. In addition, it was compared with ofloxacin (CAS 82419-36-1), levofloxacin (CAS 100986-85-4), ciprofloxacin urinary tract infections in mice, as well as its pharmacokinetics. 1. The antibacterial activity of NM394 (6-fluoro-1-methyl-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-4H-[1,3]thiazeto[3,2- a]quinoline-3-carboxylic acid), an active metabolite of prulifloxacin, against gram-positive clinical isolates was inferior to that of levofloxacin and tosufloxacin, and equal to that of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Against gram-negative clinical isolates, the activity of NM394 was superior to that of the reference drugs. 2. The therapeutic effect of prulifloxacin on experimental urinary tract infection with Escherichia coli in mice was equal to that of tosufloxacin and ciprofloxacin and superior to that of ofloxacin and levofloxacin. Its therapeutic effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection was equal to that of tosufloxacin and ciprofloxacin, and superior to that of ofloxacin. Against urinary tract infection with olfloxacin-resistant Enterobacter cloacae, prulifloxacin was the most effective of all the drugs tested. 3. The maximal serum concentration of prulifloxacin was slightly higher than that of ciprofloxacin, and the area under the curve (AUC) for prulifloxacin was 1/4 that of ofloxacin, levofloxacin and tosufloxacin.…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free