Evidence Hub

Magnesium for Migraine and Primary Headache Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Annick Mélanie Magnerou, Sini Victor, Doumbe Jacques Narcisse, Gams Massi Daniel, Gueumekane Bila Lamou Eric, Kuate Tegueu Callixte, Mapoure Njankouo Yacouba

2026

Abstract

This project aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnesium supplementation for the prevention and treatment of migraine and other adult primary headache disorders. Magnesium has been proposed as a therapeutic option because of its role in neuronal excitability, vascular regulation, neurotransmitter release, and cortical spreading depression, mechanisms that are implicated in headache pathophysiology. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted following PRISMA 2020 recommendations. Electronic databases searched included PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and African Journals Online (AJOL). Eligible studies included adult participants diagnosed with migraine or other primary headache disorders who received oral or intravenous magnesium interventions compared with placebo, standard care, or active treatments. The primary objective of this review is to synthesize available evidence regarding the effects of magnesium on headache frequency, intensity, duration, acute pain relief, treatment response, quality of life, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Due to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity across studies, findings were synthesized narratively rather than through formal meta-analysis. Expected outcomes include a comprehensive summary of the current evidence supporting magnesium use in migraine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free