Evidence Hub

Folic acid supplementation for stroke prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized clinical trials worldwide

Nan Zhang, Ziyi Zhou, Xi-Ying Chi, Fang-Fang Fan, Shuqun Li, Yun Song, Yan Zhang, X. Qin et al.

Clinical Nutrition, 2024

115,559 participants · 31 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The AHA/ASA guidelines for primary stroke prevention are almost a decade old. The current recommendation regarding folic acid supplementation is based on only 8 clinical trials, and an additional 13 folate trials have been published since then. This meta-analysis aims to fill in critical evidence gaps by comprehensively evaluating 21 published trials with particular attention given to identifying the true influences through stratification.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched from inception to April 4, 2023. This study included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of folic acid with stroke as one of the reporting endpoints. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the association between folic acid supplementation and the risk of stroke in a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Results from the 21 pooled RCTs totaling 115,559 participants showed that folic acid supplementation significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 10% (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.98). Subgroup analyses showed that folic acid efficacy was greater in areas without fortified grain or with partially-fortified grain (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.93; RR = 1.04 in areas with grain fortification, P-interaction = 0.003). In this group, folic acid supplementation was most efficacious in those without a history of stroke or myocardial infarction (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86; RR = 0.94 for participants with a history of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 115,559 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free