Evidence Hub

Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of migraine: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Chen Hu, Yilin Fan, Shaoping Wu, Yu-Ting Zou, Xiaosu Qu

American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2021

301 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is not well established to use vitamin D supplementation for migraine, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the efficacy of vitamin D for migraine patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched up to May 2021, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effect of vitamin D for migraine patients.

RESULTS

Six RCTs and 301 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group in migraine patients, vitamin D supplementation could remarkably decrease headache attacks per month (MD = -2.74; 95% CI = -3.82 to -1.67; P < 0.00001), headache days per month (MD = -1.56; 95% CI = -2.44 to -0.68; P = 0.0005) and MIDAS score (MD = -5.72; 95% CI = -10.90 to -0.54; P = 0.03), but demonstrated no obvious influence on attack duration (MD = -2.20; 95% CI = -7.38 to 2.97; P = 0.40) or headache severity (MD = -0.56; 95% CI = -1.18 to 0.06; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D supplementation provided additional benefits to treat migraine.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 301 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free