Evidence Hub

The effect of combined magnesium and vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D status, systemic inflammation, and blood pressure: A randomized double-blinded controlled trial

May Cheung, R. Dall, P. Shewokis, A. Altasan, S. Volpe, Renee E. Amori, H. Singh, D. Sukumar

Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2022

43 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Poor vitamin D and magnesium status is observed in individuals who are overweight and obese (Owt/Ob) and is often associated with a heightened risk of cardiovascular disease. Magnesium is a cofactor that assists vitamin D metabolism. We aimed to determine the efficacy of a combined magnesium and vitamin D regimen compared with vitamin D only on increasing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations and the effects of these supplements on cardiometabolic outcomes.

METHODS

This 12-week double-blinded randomized controlled trial had three treatment arms: magnesium + vitamin D (MagD; 360 mg magnesium glycinate + 1000 IU vitamin D 3 × daily), vitamin D only (VitD; 1000 IU vitamin D 3 × daily), and placebo. A total of 95 Owt/Ob participants were randomized into one of these three study arms. Anthropometry, dietary intake, concentrations of serum 25OHD, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum inflammatory markers, and blood pressure were obtained at baseline and week 12.

RESULTS

The MagD group experienced the greatest increase in serum 25OHD concentrations (6.3 ± 8.36 ng/mL; P 132 mmHg in the MagD group. There were no statistically significant treatment effects on serum PTH concentrations and markers of inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined MagD treatment may be more effective in increasing serum 25OHD concentrations compared with VitD supplementation alone in Owt/Ob individuals.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free