Evidence Hub

The effects of empagliflozin on ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Abedi F, Mohammadpour AH, Ghavami V, Heidari-Bakavoli A, Jomezadeh V, Tayyebi M

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2024

72 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors such as empagliflozin are one of the main treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and heart failure (HF). They have also demonstrated anti-arrhythmic effects in some preclinical and clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of empagliflozin on ventricular arrhythmias in HF patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). In a prospective double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of Iran County, Mashhad (72 patients 1:1), we compared the frequency and proportion of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD therapies during the 24 weeks to the prior 24 weeks. Results revealed that empagliflozin significantly reduced the frequency and proportion of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/fibrillation (VF) episodes (P = 0.019 and 0.039, respectively). Moreover, it tended to reduce the frequency and proportion of ICD therapies, including anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and shock. Subgroup analysis of patients with or without any antiarrhythmic drugs (digoxin, mexiletine, amiodarone, or sotalol) revealed that only patients who were previously on the antiarrhythmic drugs benefit from empagliflozin antiarrhythmic effects. In conclusion, empagliflozin exhibits anti-arrhythmic effects in HF patients with an ICD. Larger and long-term clinical studies are still needed to investigate and confirm all positive effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in this regard. Trial registration number: IRCT20120520009801N7 (Approval date:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 72 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free