Evidence Hub

Quantitative sensory testing of pain in osteoporosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial with magnesium supplementation

Marie-Eva Pickering, Véronique Morel, Macian Nicolas, Christian Dualé, Elise Sortais, T. Graven-Nielsen, Bruno Pereira, G. Pickering

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2026

22 participants

Abstract

Bisphosphonates (BP) are a recommended treatment for osteoporosis and an analgesic effect has been suggested. Magnesium is involved in pain mechanisms, mood disorders and also in bone homeostasis. Association of BPs and magnesium has however not been studied to explore pain processes in post-menopausal osteoporosis. In this pilot ancillary study of a randomized clinical trial in post-menopausal osteoporosis, women were randomized to standard care with intravenous Zoledronate (BP group, n = 22) or BP with oral magnesium (BPMg group, n = 22), 200 mg/day for 3 months. Endpoints were quantified before and 1 year after treatment as spontaneous pain, anxiety, depression and sleep quality, as well as quantitative sensory testing of pain sensitivity by thermal thresholds and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), a psychophysical marker of the functionality of pain modulation at spinal level. Thirty-five women (68.2 ± 7.3 years old) with post-menopausal osteoporosis completed the analysis. Compared with baseline, magnesium supplementation did not change significantly any of the endpoints. CPM at baseline was low (-0.92 ± 1.14) and not reversed by treatment. This study in post-menopausal osteoporosis underlines for the first time that zoledronate or zoledronate with magnesium have no effect on pain characteristics and thresholds. It shows a dysfunction of pain inhibitory pain pathways and its non-reversibility with treatments. It points towards the lack of any analgesic effect of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free