Evidence Hub

Effect of multivitamin-mineral supplementation versus placebo on cognitive function: Results from the clinic sub-cohort of the COSMOS randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis of three cognitive studies within COSMOS.

Chirag M. Vyas, J. Manson, H. Sesso, N. Cook, P. Rist, Alison Weinberg, M. V. Moorthy, Laura D. Baker et al.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2023

21,442 participants · 33 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Longer effects of multivitamin-mineral (MVM) supplementation on late-life cognitive function remain untested using in-person, detailed neuropsychological assessments. Furthermore, insufficient evidence exists for healthcare providers to recommend daily MVM supplements to prevent cognitive decline.

OBJECTIVES

To: 1) test MVM effects on cognitive change using in-person, detailed neuropsychological assessments; 2) conduct a meta-analysis within COSMOS (COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study) cognitive sub-studies for a robust evaluation of MVM effects on cognition.

DESIGN

COSMOS is a 2x2 factorial trial of cocoa extract [500 mg flavanols/day] and/or a daily multivitamin-mineral supplement for cardiovascular disease and cancer prevention among 21,442 US adults aged ≥60 years. There were 573 participants in the clinic sub-cohort of COSMOS (i.e., COSMOS-Clinic) who completed all cognitive tests administered at baseline. For meta-analysis, we included non-overlapping participants across three COSMOS cognitive sub-studies: COSMOS-Clinic (n=573); COSMOS-Mind (n=2158); COSMOS-Web (n=2472).

RESULTS

In COSMOS-Clinic, we observed a modest benefit of MVM, compared to placebo, on global cognition over 2 years [mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI))=0.06 standard deviation units (SU) (-0.003, 0.13)], with a significantly more favorable change in episodic memory [mean difference (95% CI)=0.12 SU (0.002, 0.23)] but not in executive function/attention [mean…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 21,442 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free