Evidence Hub

Erenumab Immunogenicity: a Pooled Analysis of Phase 2 and Phase 3 Migraine Prevention Clinical Trials (P4.098)

Bert B. Vargas, Amaal J. Starling, S. Silberstein, Yan-Chen Zhou, Marie‐Louise Trotman, F. Xue, Farhad Sahebkar-Moghaddam, H. Picard et al.

Neurology, 2018

7 citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency of occurrence and potential clinical impact of anti-erenumab antibodies. Background: Anti-drug antibodies, commonly reported with biologics, may impact the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the drug. Erenumab is a fully human anti-CGRP receptor antibody in development for migraine prevention. Here we report a pooled analysis of erenumab immunogenicity. Design/Methods: Data were obtained from all phase 2/phase 3 placebo-controlled clinical trials (NCT01952574, NCT02066415 [and open-label extension study, NCT02174861], NCT02456740, NCT02483585) that evaluated erenumab for migraine prevention. Serum was tested for anti-erenumab binding antibodies (BAbs); BAb-positive samples were tested for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Pooled data were used to determine the impact of anti-erenumab antibodies on efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results: Subject incidence of BAbs during the double-blind phase of the four placebo-controlled trials was 6.3% (56/884) with 70 mg (of 3 NAb-positive subjects, 2 were NAb-negative by end of study [EOS]), and 2.6% (13/504) with 140 mg (0 NAb-positive). With continued treatment, more than 50% of BAb-positive subjects reverted to BAb-negative status by EOS. Mean (SE) change in monthly migraine days from baseline to month 3 with the 70-mg/140-mg dose was −3.2 (0.2)/−3.6 (0.2) in BAb-negative subjects and −3.2 (0.7)/−4.1 (0.8) in BAb-positive subjects. Mean change in monthly migraine days from baseline…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free