Evidence Hub

Association Between Protocolized Magnesium Supplementation and Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

C. Yarnell, F. Angriman, E. Beaubien, Jamie Brown, Selasi Bruce-Kemevor, L. Burry, J. Craig, Simon Donato-Woodger et al.

Critical Care Medicine, 2026

4,198 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Most ICUs use protocolized magnesium supplementation, yet the clinical effect of this practice is unknown.

DESIGN

Pseudo-randomized retrospective study comparing patients who were and were not assigned to receive magnesium supplementation, using a protocol where supplementation occurs when serum levels are less than or equal to 0.95 mmol/L (2.31 mg/dL). Primary outcome was atrial fibrillation or flutter within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were tachyarrhythmia (supraventricular tachycardia or ventricular arrhythmia) and death within 24 hours.

SETTING

ICUs with a shared magnesium supplementation protocol, in five hospitals in Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024.

PATIENTS

Adults (18 yr old or older) admitted to ICU with a magnesium protocol order, at their first magnesium level of 0.92-0.99 mmol/L (2.24-2.41 mg/dL). To minimize confounding, we included only patients with a level near the supplementation threshold.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

EXPOSURE

Magnesium level 0.92-0.95 mmol/L (2.24-2.31 mg/dL, supplementation group) vs. 0.96-0.99 mmol/L (2.32-2.41 mg/dL, no supplementation group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified 4198 patients; median age 70 years, 41% female, 39% invasively ventilated; 2144 (51%) in the supplementation group, of whom 77% received magnesium, and 2054 (49%) in the no supplementation group, of whom 9% received magnesium. Atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred within 24 hours in 355 (16.6%) in the supplementation group…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 4,198 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free