Evidence Hub

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Sarashina A, Ueki K, Sasaki T, Tanaka Y, Koiwai K, Sakamoto W, Woerle HJ, Salsali A et al.

Clinical therapeutics, 2014

32 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS: In an open-label, parallel-group study, 32 Japanese patients with T2DM and different degrees of renal function (n = 8 per renal function category: normal renal function, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR; Japanese equation] ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m(2); mild renal impairment, eGFR of 60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m(2); moderate renal impairment, eGFR of 30-<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2); and severe renal impairment, eGFR of 15-<30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) received a single 25 mg dose of empagliflozin.

FINDINGS: Empagliflozin exposure increased with increasing renal impairment. Maximum empagliflozin plasma concentrations were similar among all renal function groups. Adjusted geometric mean ratios for extent of exposure (AUC0-∞) to empagliflozin versus normal renal function were 128.8% (95% CI, 106.0-156.6%), 143.8% (95% CI, 118.3-174.8%), and 152.3% (95% CI, 125.3-185.2%) for patients with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively. Decreases in renal clearance of empagliflozin correlated with eGFR. Urinary glucose excretion decreased with increasing renal impairment and correlated with eGFR (adjusted mean [SE] change from baseline: 75.0 [4.84] g, 62.6 [5.75] g, 57.9 [4.86] g, and 23.7 [5.24] g for patients with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 32 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free