Evidence Hub

Fluoride application in middle childhood. A cross-sectional study

Vera Wiesmüller, S. Müller, Amelie Großhans, U. Lepperdinger, I. Kapferer-Seebacher

Clinical Oral Investigations, 2025

458 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Fluoride application is crucial for caries prevention; yet guidelines for middle childhood remain limited. This study evaluated the daily fluoride exposure of children aged six to 12 years and compare the findings with the available recommendations. Children applied their usual amount of toothpaste to a manual toothbrush, which was weighed before and after application. Additionally, data on residence in relation to fluoridation of tap water, frequency of oral hygiene practices, the oral hygiene products used, additional fluoride supplementation, and parental knowledge regarding fluoride prophylaxis was collected to determine daily fluoride exposure. The data were analysed in accordance with current recommendations. The study included 458 children aged 8.0 ± 1.77 years. Age-appropriate toothpaste was used by 76.4%. The mean quantity of toothpaste utilised was 0.42 ± 0.27, while 0.5–0.75 g are recommended. The mean daily fluoride intake via toothpaste was found to be 1.01 ± 0.81 mg. 94.1% of the study cohort does not meet the recommendations of the German Society for Preventive Dentistry. Only a third of the cohort used at least one supplementary fluoride source in addition to toothpaste (37.7%). 43.48% of legal guardians expressed the opinion that fluoride prophylaxis is recommended for their child. The results highlight an urgent need for parental education. In an area of low-fluoridated drinking water children over six years should use a full brush length (>0.5 g) of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 458 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free