Evidence Hub

Immediate and short-term outcomes of in-hospital canagliflozin initiation in acute heart failure: Results from the CANA-AHF randomized clinical trial

El-Gazar RA, Zarif B, Ali AA, William MM, Abbassi MM, Sabry NA

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care, 2025

71 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early initiation of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, in acute heart failure (AHF) patients increases urine output, reduces hospital stays, and enhances quality of life post-hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVES

This trial aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of early canagliflozin initiation compared to empagliflozin in hospitalized AHF patients with volume overload.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, open-labeled, randomized equivalence trial. AHF diabetic and non-diabetic patients were randomized within 24 h from hospital admission to either receive 100 mg canagliflozin or 10 mg empagliflozin in addition to the standardized protocol for an intravenous loop diuretic. The primary outcome was the median of daily diuresis during the hospitalization period.

RESULTS

Hospitalized AHF patients were enrolled (71 patients per group). The median daily diuresis during the hospitalization period was 4200 ml in the canagliflozin group, which was statistically equivalent to empagliflozin (4117 ml) with a difference of 83 ml, which falls within the predefined equivalence margin (±10) % of the median of daily diuresis of empagliflozin; Δ = ±411.7 mL), confirming equivalence via bootstrap TSOT p < 0.001. No difference was observed in diuretic response, dyspnea score, orthodema congestion score or length of hospital stay. The NT-proBNP level at day 30 post-discharge and the change in KCCQ-TSS from baseline to day 90 were statistically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 71 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free