Evidence Hub

Risk factors and nomogram model for recurrence of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in postmenopausal women: a multicenter cross-sectional study

Qin Pan, Bei Li, Kai Zou

Frontiers in Neurology, 2025

490 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the risk factors for recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in postmenopausal women within 1 year of canalith repositioning procedure (CRP), and develops a risk model based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), estradiol, and calcium levels to provide early identification of high-risk groups and guide prevention and treatment strategies. Methods Data from postmenopausal women with BPPV, diagnosed and successfully treated with CRP at five hospitals in Sichuan Province between January 2019 and January 2024, were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were divided into BPPV validation and training sets in a 3:7 ratio. Clinical data were categorized into recurrence and non-recurrence subgroups based on whether BPPV recurred after treatment. LASSO regression identified factors influencing recurrence within 1 year after CRP, and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis was used to develop a risk nomogram prediction model (NPM). Results A total of 490 patients were enrolled, with 147 in the validation set and 343 in the training sets. Among them, 151 patients (30.82%) experienced recurrenced, including 58 (30.61%) in the validation set and 106 (30.90%) in the training sets. LASSO and MLR analyses identified migraine (OR = 2.208, 95% CI = 1.278–3.817), serum calcium (OR = 0.601, 95% CI = 0.447–0.81), 25(OH)D (OR = 0.785, 95% CI = 0.713–0.864), and serum estradiol (OR = 0.820, 95% CI = 0.752–0.894) as significant factors influencing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 490 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free