Evidence Hub

Sex- and age-specific associations of serum essential elements with diabetes among the Chinese adults: a community-based cross-sectional study

Dongmei Wang, Hong Ye, Siyang Liu, Hualin Duan, Qin-Tao Ma, Nanfang Yao, Zihao Gui, Gen-Feng Yu et al.

Nutrition and Metabolism, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Although several studies have found the relationship between essential elements and diabetes, the studies about the association of essential elements with diabetes diagnosed according to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in a sex- and age-specific manner were limited. To investigate the linear and nonlinear relationship of five essential elements including iron (Fe), copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca) with diabetes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and HbA1c and to evaluate the sex- and age-specific heterogeneities in these relationships. A total of 8392 community-dwelling adults were recruited to complete a questionnaire and undergo checkups of anthropometric parameters and serum levels of five metals (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mg, and Ca). The multivariable logistic and linear regression, the restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis, and subgroup analysis were applied to find the associations between the essential elements and the prevalence of diabetes as well as FPG, PPG, and HbA1c. In the multivariable logistic regression and multivariable linear regression, serum Cu was positively associated with FPG, PPG, and HbA1c while serum Mg was significantly inversely correlated with FPG, PPG, HbA1c, and diabetes (all P < 0.001). In the RCS analysis, the non-linear relationship of Cu and diabetes (P < 0.001) was found. In the subgroup analysis, stronger positive associations of Cu with diabetes (P for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free