Evidence Hub

Efficacy of sirolimus for the prevention of recurrent pneumothorax in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a case series

Li Zhou, Ruo-Yun Ouyang, Hong Luo, Si-Ying Ren, Ping Chen, Yating Peng, Ting Liu, Guiqian Liu

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 2018

22 citations

Abstract

Pneumothorax is one of the most common symptoms in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). However, current management strategies for patients with LAM who present with recurrent pneumothorax remain inadequate. Here, we describe the successful prevention of recurrent pneumothorax by sirolimus treatment in five women with LAM. Before sirolimus treatment, all patients had received supplemental oxygen support, repeated chest tube drainage, or surgeries for management of the recurrent pneumothorax. Sirolimus treatment was initiated when the pneumothorax was completely resolved, and no patient developed pneumothorax during treatment. Moreover, they exhibited a significantly improved subjective quality of life, increased exercise capacity, and mild adverse effects such as mucositis, irregular menstruation, and delayed wound healing. On discontinuation of sirolimus or in the event that the plasma sirolimus level was markedly low, pneumothorax tended to relapse. The findings from these cases provide valuable insights that will aid in the improvement of treatment strategies for patients with LAM and recurrent pneumothorax.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free