Evidence Hub

POS1282 PEDIATRIC INFLAMMATORY MULTISYSTEM SYNDROME TEMPORALLY-ASSOCIATED WITH SARS-CoV-2 – A PORTUGUESE SINGLE CENTRE CASE SERIES

B. Santos, I. Cardoso, S. Miranda, F. Aguiar, M. Rodrigues, I. Brito

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2022

19 participants

Abstract

Across the globe, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 appears to affect paediatric population in a milder and nonthreatening way, when compared to adults. However, since April 2020 case reports of previously healthy children presenting with unremitting fever, biologic inflammatory syndrome and cardiac dysfunction have been emerging. This syndrome, which has been termed Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome Temporally Associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection (PIMS-TS), represents a rare complication of COVID-19 in children1.To describe the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics, course, management and outcomes of hospitalized children diagnosed with PIMS-TS in a Portuguese tertiary care hospital.A retrospective study including children (< 18 years) that attended our hospital from April 2020 to December 2021 was performed. All the children included fulfilled the case definition of PIMS-TS published by the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Sociodemographic and clinical data, laboratory markers and imaging findings were collected.A total of 19 children met the criteria for PIMS-TS, 68% male with a mean age at diagnosis of 8 years old (IQR 5.8-15). They were all caucasian, except for a mixed-race patient, and all previously healthy, except one patient who was obese. Twelve had recent infection by SARS-CoV-2 detected by reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR and 18 had positive IgG serology.All had fever at diagnosis, with a median duration of 6…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free