Evidence Hub

Azithromycin for eradication of Ureaplasma and prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a meta-analysis

Zhe Chen, Zhi-Mei Jiang, Dan Liu, Y. Wen, L. Zeng, Liang Huang, Jing Shi, Ling-Li Zhang

Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2025

1,723 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of azithromycin in eradicating Ureaplasma and preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. Design Six literature databases and three clinical trial registration platforms were searched for studies up to 22 July 2024. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V.5.3. Results A total of 1723 preterm infants from 10 randomised controlled trials and 3 case series were included. In all preterm infants, azithromycin significantly improved Ureaplasma clearance (relative risk (RR)=1.47, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.85) and reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD)=−2.16, 95% CI −2.65 to −1.68), duration of supplemental oxygen (MD=−5.46, 95% CI −6.65 to −4.37) and length of stay (MD=−4.98, 95% CI −7.19 to −2.76) compared with placebo; however, there was no significant reduction in BPD, BPD-death or mortality, with low quality of evidence. In Ureaplasma-positive preterm infants, azithromycin significantly reduced BPD-death (RR=0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99) and mechanical ventilation (MD=−2.20, 95% CI −2.72 to −1.69), compared with placebo, and significantly increased Ureaplasma clearance rate. Additionally, compared with erythromycin, azithromycin reduced BPD, without a statistically significant difference. Compared with placebo, azithromycin showed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy, intraventricular haemorrhage, etc. Conclusions Low-quality…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,723 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free