Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin reduces diffuse myocardial fibrosis by extracellular volume mapping: A meta-analysis of clinical studies

Wang H, Ding L, Tian L, Tian Y, Liao L, Zhao J

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022

16 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin on diffuse myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Databases including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, and Sinomed for clinical studies of empagliflozin on myocardial fibrosis were searched. Two authors extracted the data and evaluated study quality independently. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for continuous variables. Review Manager 5.3 was used to performed the analysis.

RESULTS: Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. One of the six studies was assessed as poor quality by the assessment of methodological quality; however, the remaining five studies were considered good. The WMD value of △extracellular volume (ECV) was merged by the fixed-effect model, and the pooled effect size was -1.48 (95% CI -1.76 to -1.21, P < 0.00001), which means in favor of empagliflozin. Heterogeneity analysis did not find any heterogeneity (chi2 = 0.39, P = 0.82, I 2 = 0%). In addition, empagliflozin had a tendency to reduce ECV compared to treatment before with no statistical significance (WMD = -0.29, 95% CI -1.26 to 0.67, P = 0.55; heterozygosity test, chi2 = 2.66, P = 0.45, I 2 = 0%). The WMD value of △native T1 was also merged by the fixed-effect model, but the pooled effect size showed neither statistical difference between empagliflozin and placebo treatment (WMD = -5.40, 95% CI -21.63 to 10.83, P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free