Evidence Hub

Causal Risk Factors for Type 1 Diabetes in Mendelian Randomization Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Li M, Shen P, Liu C, Li J, Qiu S, Wang Z

Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2026

Abstract

Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic disease mediated by autoimmunity, with complex and not fully elucidated pathogenesis. Mendelian randomization (MR) utilizes genetic instrumental variables to minimize confounding and reverse causation; however, individual MR studies are often limited by sample size and result heterogeneity.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and other databases from 2014 to 2025, ultimately including 53 MR studies (covering 243 exposures). Random-effects models were used to pool effect sizes. Heterogeneity was quantified by Cochran's Q test and I2 statistic. Bias was further controlled using Egger's regression and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis.

Results: This study integrated 53 MR studies (243 exposures) and identified key causal factors for T1DM.IL2RA (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.17-0.27) and TYK2 (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.54-0.69) showed significant protective effects, while IL6R (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.48-2.65) was associated with increased risk. For metabolites, 3-phenylpropionic acid (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96) and cinnamoylglycine (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96) were protective, while trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO; OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.20) increased risk. Among gut microbiota, Prevotella 9 (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08-1.30) was positively associated with risk, whereas Bifidobacterium (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.95) showed a protective effect. Childhood obesity (OR = 1.32, 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free