Evidence Hub

Abstract CT093: Bimodal relationship between magnesium supplementation and vitamin D status and metabolism: Results from a randomized trial

Q. Dai, Xiangzhu Zhu, J. Manson, Yi-Qing Song, Xing-Nan Li, A. Franke, R. Costello, A. Rosanoff et al.

Clinical Trials, 2018

250 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: There is inconsistent evidence from epidemiologic studies and randomized trials on the role of vitamin D on colorectal adenoma recurrence, colorectal cancer incidence, and total cancer incidence. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies indicate vitamin D synthesizing and metabolizing enzymes are Mg-dependent. The 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee determined that magnesium (Mg) is under consumed relative to the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) in the US population. In a single study, patients with Mg-dependent vitamin-D-resistant rickets received intramuscular infusion with vitamin D up to 600,000 IU which did not lead to any improvements in vitamin D deficiency. However, supplementation with Mg substantially reverse the resistance to vitamin D treatment. We previously reported from observational studies that Mg intake significantly interacted with vitamin D in affecting vitamin D status and risk of mortality. In this first randomized trial examining the interaction between Mg and vitamin D, we tested our hypothesis that Mg supplementation alters vitamin D synthesis and metabolism depending upon baseline circulating 25(OH)D concentration. Methods: The Personalized Prevention of Colorectal Cancer Trial (PPCCT) is a double-blind 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial which enrolled 250 participants and randomized them to placebo or a customized dose of Mg supplementation based on background dietary intakes levels. The current study is an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 250 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free