Evidence Hub

Responsiveness of ThymoDream® as a natural modulator of the circadian axis: a comparative RCT with melatonin supplementation employing melatonin profiling and actigraphy

Harshith CS, Jestin TV, Syam DS, Prathibha P, Allimuthu N, Abhirami N, Radhika A, Krishnakumar IM et al.

Frontiers in sleep, 2026

24 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Non-restorative sleep is frequently associated with disturbances in circadian regulation, impaired sleep quality, and reduced daytime functioning.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, cross over study compared black cumin oil extract (TD; 200 mg) with synthetic melatonin (s-Mel; 5 mg/day) in 24 individuals with non-restorative sleep. Participants received each intervention for 7 nights separated by a 7-day washout period. Plasma melatonin was measured at fixed nighttime intervals under dim light to determine dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO), while sleep parameters were assessed using actigraphy. DLMO serves as an important physiological marker of circadian timing. Daytime sleepiness was evaluated with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).

Results: Both interventions significantly increased nocturnal plasma melatonin concentration under dim-light conditions (P < 0.001). TD was associated with an earlier attainment of the predefined plasma melatonin threshold of 10 pg/mL.

Discussion: The interpretation of the corresponding threshold timing in the s-Mel arm was limited due to exogenous melatonin administration. s-Mel induced a rapid early rise in melatonin followed by a sharp decline, whereas TD demonstrated a more sustained nocturnal profile. Actigraphy outcomes were generally comparable; sleep latency and total sleep time improved more with s-Mel, while TD significantly reduced cortisol levels and daytime sleepiness. Overall, TD showed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free