Evidence Hub

P023 A systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological interventions for sleep problems in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

Raghad A Alonazi, Rahaf Alonazi, A. Al-Ahmed, Hajar Arnous, Faisal F. Alotaibi, Hetaf A. Alammar

Poster Presentations, 2019

1 citation

Abstract

Aim The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise the high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions to manage sleep problems in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods The studies we included here were (RCTs) looking at the efficacy and safety of pharmacological intervention for sleep problems in children and adolescents with ASD. The studies had to include objective sleep measures and/or subjective sleep measures. They all dealt with pharmacological interventions, with medications including melatonin and antipsychotics, and they all compared these drugs with placebos. We used four databases: ERIC, ProQuest, PubMed and Ovid Medline. We assessed the papers in accordance with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results We found six studies that used RCT designs. Five of them used melatonin, and one study used an antipsychotic. In studies using melatonin, a meta-analysis revealed that there was a large effect size of using melatonin in reducing sleep latency in children and adolescents with ASD. The overall effect size was -0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]) -1.11, -0.63, Z=7.11 (P<0.00001). In terms of antipsychotics, our review revealed that the antipsychotic resperidon was safe and effective in managing sleep problems in children and adolescents with ASD. Both melatonin and resperidon improved sleep latency and reduced night-time awakenings. However, mild side effects were reported in a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free