Evidence Hub

Head-to-head comparative effectiveness of empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin and DPP-4 inhibitors on clinical and metabolic outcomes: a nationwide propensity-matched study

Lee DH, Kim H, You S, Bae Y, Yoo H, Jeong B, Lee SW, Lee YS et al.

2026

17,050 participants

Abstract

Abstract This retrospective study compared the clinical and metabolic effectiveness of empagliflozin (EMPA) versus dapagliflozin (DAPA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) using real-world data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (2013–2024). Adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated treatment and maintained it for > 365 days were included. Clinical and metabolic outcomes were analyzed using Cox models and linear mixed models, respectively, following 1:1 propensity score-matching (n = 17,050 per group for EMPA vs. DAPA and EMPA vs. DPP4i).Compared to DAPA, EMPA was associated with lower risks of hypoglycemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.44–0.82) and all-cause hospitalization (aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–0.99); other outcomes were comparable. Compared to DPP4i, EMPA was associated with significantly lower risks of hospitalization (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80–0.87), kidney events (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66–0.88), hypoglycemia (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42–0.83), and diabetic ketoacidosis (aHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33–0.75).In conclusion, while EMPA and DAPA showed broadly similar outcomes supporting a class effect, EMPA demonstrated superior benefits over DPP4i in reducing hospitalization and renal events in routine clinical practice.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free