Evidence Hub

Association of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Ding H, Jiang L, Lin X, Ye C, Chun B

BMC public health, 2025

766,848 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the dose-response relationships between physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior(SB) (including near work [NW] and screen time [ST]), sleep duration (SD), and myopia risk among children and adolescents.

Design: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to November 19, 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and ROBINS-I tools. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate categorical and continuous dose-response relationships. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity sources and test robustness.

Results: A total of 45 observational studies (766,848 participants aged 5-19 years) were included. Categorical analyses showed that, compared with the lowest exposure categories, higher PA levels (highest: OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.96; intermediate: OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.93) and longer SD (highest: OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.92; intermediate: OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.92) significantly reduced myopia risk. Conversely, higher levels of NW (highest: OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.28-2.27; intermediate: OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.19-1.50) and ST (highest: OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.14-2.22; intermediate: OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12-1.49) were associated with significantly increased risk. In the continuous dose-response meta-analysis, a linear association was observed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 766,848 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free