Evidence Hub

Genetic Determinants of Stress Reactivity in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Implications for Maternal and Fetal Health

Ioana Denisa S, George SF, Sorina FS, Bogdan-Ionel D, Alina-Iasmina D, Andreea A, Aris B, Daniela I et al.

Genes, 2026

431,000 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Gestation is a period of significant biological plasticity where the intrauterine environment influences fetal development via "fetal programming". This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the association between genetic determinants-specifically the NR3C1, FKBP5, and CRHR1 genes, chosen for their pivotal role in the functional regulation and feedback sensitivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis-and stress reactivity during pregnancy. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, yielding an initial total of 1430 records. After removing duplicates and screening 669 studies, a total of 34 primary observational studies were included in the systematic review and qualitative synthesis. For the quantitative synthesis, 27 articles provided sufficient data, resulting in k = 39 independent effect sizes analyzed via a mixed-effects model to account for tissue-specific and cohort-specific outcomes. Results: Systematic analysis reveals that maternal psychosocial stress significantly correlates with NR3C1 hypermethylation, acting as a biological mediator for neonatal cortisol dysregulation and hippocampal volume reduction. The FKBP5 rs1360780 polymorphism emerged as a key moderator of structural vulnerability, showing a "double-hit" effect when combined with epigenetic alterations. Furthermore, the study identifies sex-specific susceptibility, with divergent placental trajectories…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 431,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free