Evidence Hub

Associations between meeting 24-hour movement guidelines and health-related quality of life in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tuo W, Yan P, Qin W, Li L, Zhou Z, Zhang T, Chen L, Song Y et al.

BMC public health, 2025

170,670 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to 24-h movement guidelines that include physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB), and sleep is linked to improved health outcomes, yet its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older adults remains underexplored. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the relationship between adherence to guidelines for 24-h movement behaviours and HRQoL in older adults. METHODS: A systematic search of four databases was conducted to identify studies published from the date of inception to January 2025. The Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess the risk of bias among the included studies. Random-effects models were used to conduct a meta-analysis involving the extracted proportions and odds ratios (OR) from each study. The Freeman–Tukey transformation was applied to stabilise the variance of proportional data before meta-analysis, and pooled proportions were back-transformed to their original scale for reporting. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s test. A sensitivity analysis was conducted, which included changing the random-effects model to a fixed-effects model and adopting a leave-one-out analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five cross-sectional articles were included, covering a total of 170,670 older adults aged ≥ 60 years. We found that 24.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.1%–26.5%, p < 0.01) of older adults adhered to at least one movement guideline, among whom 23.0%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 170,670 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free