Evidence Hub

Prevalence of sleep problems in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Z. Nadeem, O. Ur Rehman, Umar Akram, Muhammad Ali Iftikhar, H. Irfan, Eeshal Fatima, Hiba Imran, Sonia Hurjkaliani et al.

Sleep Medicine, 2025

8 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with cerebral palsy (CwCP) often struggle with sleep issues, which has a serious negative influence on their general health and quality of life. There are insufficient data on the prevalence of various sleep disorders, even though recognising and treating them is vital.

OBJECTIVES

Determining the prevalence of sleep disorders in CwCP is the primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for all relevant articles using pre-specified eligibility criteria. Pooled proportions of CwCP having sleep problems were calculated in a random effects model using R version 4.3.2.

RESULTS

The updated systematic review and meta-analysis included 42 studies. The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) showed abnormal scores in 26 % (95 % CI: 17 %-37 %) of children with CP. Subscale abnormalities included disorders of initiation and maintenance of sleep (28 %), sleep breathing disorders (17 %), excessive somnolence (12 %), sleep hyperhidrosis (10 %), and sleep-wake transition disorders (19 %). The Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) indicated abnormal scores in 39 % (95 % CI: 6 %-80 %) of children. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings, though some publication bias was noted in the PSQ outcome.

CONCLUSION

About a quarter of CwCP have experienced sleep problems, which may deteriorate their quality of life. In order to improve the quality of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free