Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin preserves mitochondrial function and reduces tubular injury in obese type 2 diabetic ZSF-1 rats

Weissbach H, Seitz M, Moosheimer J, Gembardt F, Schauer A, Männel A, Pieper MP, Hugo C et al.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 2026

Abstract

Abstract Diabetic nephropathy remains the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. The ZSF-1 rat model combines features known as the metabolic syndrome, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and obesity, developing progressive kidney disease. In this study, we investigated the nephroprotective mechanisms of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin, focusing on mitochondrial function. Obese ZSF-1 rats were randomized at 24 weeks of age to receive either placebo or empagliflozin for eight weeks, while lean ZSF-1 rats served as healthy controls. Kidney function, assessed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), was significantly reduced in obese rats and was not improved by empagliflozin treatment. However, obese animals exhibited increased tubular injury, tubular cast formation, and elevated total and tubular proteinuria, all of which were attenuated by empagliflozin. Mitochondrial function was evaluated in freshly isolated cortical kidney mitochondria by measuring oxygen consumption. Obese ZSF-1 rats showed impaired respiratory capacity and reduced protein expression of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes II, III, IV, and V, indicating mitochondrial dysfunction. Empagliflozin treatment improved mitochondrial function by enhancing complex I- and IV-linked respiration and restoring the expression of OXPHOS complexes II, III, and IV. In addition, empagliflozin treatment was linked to improved mitochondrial dynamics and modulation of autophagic activity, suggesting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free