Evidence Hub

Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis: The Efficacy of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Sleep Disturbances in Children and Adolescents

S. Hornsey, C. Gosling, L. Jurek, Mikaïl Nourredine, Laurence Telesia, Marco Solmi, Isabel Butt, K. Greenwell et al.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2024

26 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews (SRs) - with or without meta-analysis (MA) - of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing non-pharmacological sleep interventions for children and adolescents across various clinical populations.

METHOD

We searched multiple electronic databases up to 24/01/24. Meta-analyzable data from RCTs in the retrieved SRs/MAs were pooled using Metaumbrella. Primary outcomes were subjective/objective child sleep parameters. Additional outcomes included child health/functioning and parental sleep/health. The quality of the MAs/SRs was assessed with AMSTAR-2, and the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

RESULTS

We included 93 SRs/MAs covering 393 RCTs, with 25 (17%, 39% and 30%: high, moderate, and low quality) providing data for quantitative synthesis. Behavioral interventions, usually multicomponent including parent training, psychoeducation, and/or specific sleep therapy/strategies, showed beneficial effects on night waking, sleep duration, overall sleep disturbance, mood/depression, and maternal sleep quality (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.10 to 0.80) in participants with sleep problems without a formal sleep disorder diagnosis. For those with a formal diagnosis (mainly insomnia), benefits were found for night waking, sleep efficiency (subjective/actigraphically measured), and sleep onset latency (mean SMD: 0.49 to 0.97). Those with ADHD improved in bedtime resistance, night waking, parasomnias, sleep anxiety,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free